Arnold & Associates, Inc. v. Misys Healthcare Systems

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that promises that “extended approximately 18 months into the future . . . fall squarely 25 within the Statute of Frauds”
• explaining that “parties may 3 plead alternatively or inconsistently”
• “The mere 22 existence of a contract governing the dispute does not automatically invalidate an unjust 23 enrichment alternative theory of recovery.”
• restitution available where contract is unenforceable under the statute of frauds
• no need to use “magic words” of “in the alternative”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).