Supreme Court· 5/14/1928
Sprout v. South Bend
Citations
- 277 U.S. 163
- 48 S. Ct. 502
- 72 L. Ed. 833
- 1928 U.S. LEXIS 682
- 62 A.L.R. 45
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- striking down a “flat tax, substantial in amount and the same for busses plying the streets continuously in local service and for busses making, as do many interstate busses, only a single trip daily”
- “The privilege of engaging in [interstate] commerce is one which a state cannot deny”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brandeis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
142 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court· 1936-02-17· cited 3,147×
- Northwestern States Portland Cement Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court· 1959-02-24· cited 531×
- Sproles v. BinfordSupreme Court· 1932-05-23· cited 480×
- Dean Milk Co. v. City of MadisonSupreme Court· 1951-01-15· cited 445×
- South Carolina State Highway Department v. Barnwell Bros.Supreme Court· 1938-02-14· cited 424×
- Clark v. Paul Gray, Inc.Supreme Court· 1939-04-17· cited 400×
- Miller Brothers Co. v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1954-05-03· cited 331×
- Nashville, C. & St. LR Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court· 1933-02-06· cited 291×
- American Trucking Assns., Inc. v. ScheinerSupreme Court· 1987-06-23· cited 290×
- McGoldrick v. Berwind-White Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court· 1940-01-29· cited 284×
- SC Hwy. Dept. v. Barnwell Bros.Supreme Court· 1938-02-14· cited 260×
- Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court· 1933-02-06· cited 247×
- Evansville-Vanderburgh Airport Authority District v. Delta Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court· 1972-04-19· cited 232×
- New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. NothnagleSupreme Court· 1953-06-08· cited 209×
- Minnesota v. BlasiusSupreme Court· 1933-11-06· cited 201×
- Continental Baking Co. v. WoodringSupreme Court· 1932-05-23· cited 187×
- Eli Lilly & Co. v. Sav-On-Drugs, Inc.Supreme Court· 1961-06-19· cited 138×
- East Ohio Gas Co. v. Tax Comm'n of OhioSupreme Court· 1931-05-18· cited 122×
- Anderson, Clayton & Co. v. State ex rel AllredTexas Supreme Court· 1933-06-24· cited 120×
- Interstate Transit, Inc. v. LindseySupreme Court· 1931-04-13· cited 117×
Cites
36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Hess v. PawloskiSupreme Court· 1927-05-16· cited 750×
- Kane v. New JerseySupreme Court· 1916-12-04· cited 341×
- Crutcher v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1891-05-25· cited 324×
- Buck v. KuykendallSupreme Court· 1925-03-02· cited 320×
- Packard v. BantonSupreme Court· 1924-02-18· cited 306×
- Leloup v. Port of MobileSupreme Court· 1888-05-14· cited 283×
- St. Louis v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court· 1893-03-06· cited 210×
- Michigan Public Utilities Commission v. DukeSupreme Court· 1925-01-12· cited 189×
- Arkadelphia Milling Co. v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court· 1919-03-03· cited 176×
- Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. SettleSupreme Court· 1922-11-13· cited 162×
- Clark v. PoorSupreme Court· 1927-05-31· cited 158×
- Interstate Busses Corp. v. BlodgettSupreme Court· 1928-02-20· cited 145×
- Bowman v. Continental Oil Co.Supreme Court· 1921-06-06· cited 144×
- Patapsco Guano Co. v. North Carolina Board of AgricultureSupreme Court· 1898-05-31· cited 138×
- Erie Railroad v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1914-05-25· cited 120×
- Red \C\ Oil Manufacturing Co. v. Board of AgricultureSupreme Court· 1912-01-09· cited 117×
- George W. Bush & Sons Co. v. MaloySupreme Court· 1925-03-02· cited 109×
- Morris v. DubySupreme Court· 1927-04-18· cited 108×
- Osborne v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1897-01-04· cited 98×
- St. Louis v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court· 1893-05-15· cited 95×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.