Skip to main content
· 11/6/1933

Minnesota v. Blasius

Citations

  • 290 U.S. 1
  • 54 S. Ct. 34
  • 78 L. Ed. 131
  • 1933 U.S. LEXIS 442

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that storage of inventory awaiting orders served owner’s business purpose
  • holding that storage of inventory awaiting orders served owner’s business purpose
  • explaining that the purpose of the stoppage was central to determining whether property remained in transit
  • emphasizing that because commerce might be “subject to the regulating power of the Congress,” does not mean the state cannot lay a nondiscriminatory tax
  • “If the interstate movement has not begun, the mere fact that such a movement is contemplated does not withdraw the property from the state’s power to tax it.”
  • “[I]f a treaty fairly admits of two constructions, one restricting the rights 9 which may be claimed under it, and the other enlarging it, the more liberal construction is to be 10 preferred.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hughes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.