· 11/6/1933
Minnesota v. Blasius
Citations
- 290 U.S. 1
- 54 S. Ct. 34
- 78 L. Ed. 131
- 1933 U.S. LEXIS 442
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that storage of inventory awaiting orders served owner’s business purpose
- holding that storage of inventory awaiting orders served owner’s business purpose
- explaining that the purpose of the stoppage was central to determining whether property remained in transit
- emphasizing that because commerce might be “subject to the regulating power of the Congress,” does not mean the state cannot lay a nondiscriminatory tax
- “If the interstate movement has not begun, the mere fact that such a movement is contemplated does not withdraw the property from the state’s power to tax it.”
- “[I]f a treaty fairly admits of two constructions, one restricting the rights 9 which may be claimed under it, and the other enlarging it, the more liberal construction is to be 10 preferred.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hughes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.