Skip to main content
· 2/6/1933

Nashville, C. & St. LR Co. v. Wallace

Citations

  • 288 U.S. 249
  • 53 S. Ct. 345
  • 77 L. Ed. 730
  • 1933 U.S. LEXIS 37

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that because the matter would have been justiciable as a request for an injunction, the suit for declaratory judgment was capable of federal adjudication
  • holding that a controversy justiciable if presented in a suit for injunction is justiciable in a suit for declaratory relief
  • explaining that a case was justiciable when it sought a “definitive adjudication” of a disputed right that would not be “subject to revision by some other and more authoritative agency”
  • applying the same limitation to the Supreme Court’s review of a Tennessee state-court decision based on the state’s declaratory judgment act
  • upholding federal court's power to issue declaratory judgments prior to enactment of the Declaratory Judgment Act
  • a justiciable controversy is not \any the less so because through a modified procedure appellant has been permitted to present it in the state courts\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.