· 2/6/1933
Nashville, C. & St. LR Co. v. Wallace
Citations
- 288 U.S. 249
- 53 S. Ct. 345
- 77 L. Ed. 730
- 1933 U.S. LEXIS 37
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that because the matter would have been justiciable as a request for an injunction, the suit for declaratory judgment was capable of federal adjudication
- holding that a controversy justiciable if presented in a suit for injunction is justiciable in a suit for declaratory relief
- explaining that a case was justiciable when it sought a “definitive adjudication” of a disputed right that would not be “subject to revision by some other and more authoritative agency”
- applying the same limitation to the Supreme Court’s review of a Tennessee state-court decision based on the state’s declaratory judgment act
- upholding federal court's power to issue declaratory judgments prior to enactment of the Declaratory Judgment Act
- a justiciable controversy is not \any the less so because through a modified procedure appellant has been permitted to present it in the state courts\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stone
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.