Spring Branch I.S.D. v. Stamos

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a student’s right to participate in extracurricular activities is not a fundamental constitutional right
• holding that party challenging statute’s constitutionality must demonstrate that it fails to meet constitutional requirements
• holding that “students do not possess a constitutionally protected interest in their participation in extracurricular activities”
• holding that party challenging statute's constitutionality must demonstrate that it fails to meet constitutional requirements
• holding that party challenging statute’s constitutionality must demonstrate that it fails to meet constitutional requirements
• finding that \[n]othing in either our [Texas] state constitution or statutes entitles students to an absolute right to participation in extracurricular activities\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).