National Collegiate Athletic Assn. v. Yeo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that student-athlete’s claimed “interest in future financial opportunities” did not assert an interest protected by article I, section 19 of the Texas Constitution
• holding Yeo “asserted no interests protected by article I, section 19 of the Texas Constitution” and her claims “must therefore be dismissed”
• holding plaintiff “asserted no interests protected by article I, section 19 of the Texas Constitution” and her claims had to be dismissed
• dismissing due process claim because plaintiff asserted no interest protected by 16 article I, section 19
• dismissing due process claim because plaintiff asserted no interest protected by article I, § 19 of the Texas Constitution
• rejecting argument that liberty interest due to reputational injury is implicated because “people would have suspected 2 UIL Rule 443(f)(3) is made “[s]ubject to Section 403(f) and 463(2)(A).” UIL Rule 463(2)(A

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).