· 5/26/1981
Whipple v. Oregon School Activities Ass'n
Citations
- 629 P.2d 384
- 52 Or. App. 419
- 1981 Ore. App. LEXIS 2556
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding transfer eligibility rule did not deny the student equal protection of the laws or procedural or substantive due process under the fourteenth amendment
- holding transfer eligibility rule .did not deny the student equal protection of the laws or procedural or substantive due process under the fourteenth amendment
- holding transfer eligibility rule did not deny the student equal protection of the laws or procedural or substantive due process under the fourteenth amendment
- “Matters of public interest should sometimes be resolved by the courts even in the face of apparent mootness of the particular case at hand”
- \Matters of public interest should sometimes be resolved by the courts even in the face of apparent mootness of the particular case at hand\
- “While we think that participation in interscholastie sports is an important part of the educational process, we are not persuaded by plaintiffs argument that it is a liberty or property interest of constitutional proportions.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gillette, Roberts, Young
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.