Skip to main content
· 5/26/1981

Whipple v. Oregon School Activities Ass'n

Citations

  • 629 P.2d 384
  • 52 Or. App. 419
  • 1981 Ore. App. LEXIS 2556

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding transfer eligibility rule did not deny the student equal protection of the laws or procedural or substantive due process under the fourteenth amendment
  • holding transfer eligibility rule .did not deny the student equal protection of the laws or procedural or substantive due process under the fourteenth amendment
  • holding transfer eligibility rule did not deny the student equal protection of the laws or procedural or substantive due process under the fourteenth amendment
  • “Matters of public interest should sometimes be resolved by the courts even in the face of apparent mootness of the particular case at hand”
  • \Matters of public interest should sometimes be resolved by the courts even in the face of apparent mootness of the particular case at hand\
  • “While we think that participation in interscholastie sports is an important part of the educational process, we are not persuaded by plaintiffs argument that it is a liberty or property interest of constitutional proportions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gillette, Roberts, Young

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.