Texas Supreme Court· 3/19/1986
Spoljaric v. Percival Tours, Inc.
Citations
- 708 S.W.2d 432
- 29 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 280
- 1986 Tex. LEXIS 949
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the jury’s finding of fraudulent intent was supported by evidence of an eight month delay in producing a previously agreed upon bonus plan
- holding that a plaintiff must show more than mere failure to perform subsequent to the defendant’s promise
- holding that the jury’s finding of fraudulent intent was supported by evidence of an eight month delay in producing a previously agreed upon bonus plan
- concluding that fraudulent inducement occurred when, two weeks before the contract was signed, evidence was presented that showed the defendant intended to break a specific portion of the contract
- recognizing that intent to defraud is a fact-intensive question that depends heavily on the credibility of the witnesses and the weight to be given to their testimony
- holding that summary judgment on fraud claim that company’s president created incentive program to induce two vice-presidents to stay and never intended to implement the incentive program
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McGee, Wallace, Hill, Campbell, Gonzalez
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
487 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Formosa Plastics Corp. USA v. Presidio Engineers and Contractors, Inc.Texas Supreme Court· 1998-03-13· cited 1,875×
- American Tobacco Co., Inc. v. GrinnellTexas Supreme Court· 1997-10-02· cited 1,558×
- Tony Gullo Motors I, L.P. and Brien Garcia v. Nury ChapaTexas Supreme Court· 2006-12-22· cited 1,196×
- Johnson & Higgins of Texas, Inc. v. Kenneco Energy, Inc.Texas Supreme Court· 1998-01-16· cited 1,112×
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. S.S.Texas Supreme Court· 1993-09-10· cited 1,051×
- Natividad v. Alexsis, Inc.Texas Supreme Court· 1994-06-08· cited 918×
- T.O. Stanley Boot Co. v. Bank of El PasoTexas Supreme Court· 1993-03-24· cited 896×
- In re LipskyTexas Supreme Court· 2015-04-24· cited 894×
- Schlumberger Technology Corp. v. SwansonTexas Supreme Court· 1997-12-11· cited 742×
- Earle v. RatliffTexas Supreme Court· 1999-10-07· cited 519×
- Crim Truck & Tractor Co. v. Navistar International Transportation Corp.Texas Supreme Court· 1992-01-22· cited 511×
- Transport Insurance Co. v. FairclothTexas Supreme Court· 1995-06-15· cited 376×
- SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. DoeTexas Supreme Court· 1995-07-21· cited 290×
- Lesikar v. RappeportTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2000-12-06· cited 247×
- Aquaplex, Inc. v. Rancho La Valencia, Inc.Texas Supreme Court· 2009-10-30· cited 221×
- Hahn v. LoveTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2009-12-12· cited 214×
- Parker & Parsley Petroleum Co. v. Dresser IndustriesFifth Circuit· 1992-09-03· cited 198×
- Matter of Haber Oil Co., Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1994-01-12· cited 192×
- Vela v. MarywoodTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2000-04-27· cited 185×
- Mays v. PierceTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2006-09-26· cited 171×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court· 1965-11-03· cited 3,215×
- Trenholm v. RatcliffTexas Supreme Court· 1983-02-23· cited 634×
- Benoit v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court· 1951-05-09· cited 549×
- Smith v. National Resort Communities, Inc.Texas Supreme Court· 1979-06-27· cited 146×
- Stanfield v. O'BOYLETexas Supreme Court· 1971-01-20· cited 119×
- King v. WiseTexas Commission of Appeals· 1926-04-20· cited 61×
- Turner v. BiscoeTexas Supreme Court· 1943-04-28· cited 58×
- Stone v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1962-05-31· cited 37×
- Maulding v. NiemeyerCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1951-06-20· cited 32×
- Smith v. JungkindCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1952-10-29· cited 19×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.