Spoljaric v. Percival Tours, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the jury’s finding of fraudulent intent was supported by evidence of an eight month delay in producing a previously agreed upon bonus plan
• holding that a plaintiff must show more than mere failure to perform subsequent to the defendant’s promise
• holding that the jury’s finding of fraudulent intent was supported by evidence of an eight month delay in producing a previously agreed upon bonus plan
• concluding that fraudulent inducement occurred when, two weeks before the contract was signed, evidence was presented that showed the defendant intended to break a specific portion of the contract
• recognizing that intent to defraud is a fact-intensive question that depends heavily on the credibility of the witnesses and the weight to be given to their testimony
• holding that summary judgment on fraud claim that company’s president created incentive program to induce two vice-presidents to stay and never intended to implement the incentive program

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).