Parker & Parsley Petroleum Co. v. Dresser Industries

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court “abused its discretion in retaining jurisdiction over the state law claims after it had dismissed the federal RICO claims”
• dismissing supplemental jurisdiction because, at the point the motion was made, the parties were “not ready for trial”
• balancing common law factors when all federal claims had been dismissed
• “[T]he interests of comity and federalism are better served when federal courts avoid unnecessary determinations of state law.”
• “We review the decision to retain jurisdiction over the pendent state claims for abuse of discretion.”
• applying the same analysis under similar procedural circumstances

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).