Aquaplex, Inc. v. Rancho La Valencia, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that party’s intent is determined at time that it makes complained-of representation
• holding that because the interpretation of an unambiguous contract is a question of law, the jury’s finding on a question asking it to interpret the contract may be ignored as immaterial
• holding that some evidence supported award of damages, but not at level awarded by trial court, and remanding to court of appeals to determine whether to remand for new trial on damages or suggest remittitur
• holding that some evidence supported award of damages, but not at level awarded by trial court, and remanding to court of appeals to determine whether to remand for new trial or suggest remittitur
• holding that some evidence supported award of damages, but not at level awarded by trial court, and remanding to court of appeals to determine whether to remand for new trial on damages or suggest remittitur
• explaining that an intent to defraud may be inferred from a party’s subsequent acts after a promise was made

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).