Skip to main content

Black v. State

Citations

  • 59 So. 3d 340
  • 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 5977
  • 2011 WL 1562520

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • disagreeing with holding in Serrano v. State, 15 So. 3d 629, 635 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009), that clarification of an unequivocal invocation of right to counsel is permissible
  • a “much less deferential standard” applies if the trial court’s factual findings are based on viewing a DVD
  • detective was in violation of Miranda by continuing to ask defendant whether he wanted to talk to him about the crimes after the defendant had clearly invoked his right to counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ciklin, Levine, Polen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.