Southward v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that the use of evidence prohibited under Rule 404(b) carries with it the risk of the “forbidden inference” that a person’s bad act on a prior occasion shows that the act now at issue conforms with such person’s propensity to commit said bad acts
• “Use of Evid.R. 404(b) evidence carries with it the risk of the ‘forbidden inference’ that a person’s bad act on a prior occasion shows that the act now at issue conforms with such person’s propensity to commit said bad acts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Glenn Sciaraffa v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2015-04-07· cited 7×
• Mira v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2013-12-20· cited 4×
• James Mira v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2013-12-20· cited 3×
• Thomas H. Molina v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2015-12-10
• Walter Havvard v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2015-12-15

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Anglemyer v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2007-06-26· cited 1,831×
• Anglemyer v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2007-10-30· cited 1,479×
• Childress v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2006-06-14· cited 1,438×
• Wickizer v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1993-12-27· cited 136×
• Perez v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2007-08-24· cited 101×
• Ryle v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2005-12-13· cited 85×
• Payne v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2006-08-31· cited 46×
• Abney v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2005-02-15· cited 19×
• McClendon v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2009-08-10· cited 16×
• Sasser v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2011-03-09· cited 12×
• Phillips v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2007-10-31· cited 4×