Indiana Court of Appeals· 8/31/2006
Payne v. State
Citations
- 854 N.E.2d 7
- 2006 Ind. App. LEXIS 1791
- 2006 WL 2506492
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding a Seibert violation because police “waited to advise [the defendant] of her Miranda warnings until she essentially had divulged her entire involvement”
- finding a Seibert violation because police “waited to advise [the defendant] of her Miranda warnings until she essentially had divulged her entire involvement”
- finding a Seibert violation because police “waited to advise [the defendant] of her Miranda warnings until she essentially had divulged her entire involvement”
- finding a Seibert violation because police “waited to advise [the defendant] of her Miranda warnings until she essentially had divulged her entire involvement”
- finding a Seibert violation when pre-Miranda questioning lasted seven hours
- “[T]he mistake of fact defense is available where the defendant, acting under a reasonable and honest mistake concerning a fact or facts commits an act which, if the facts were as the defendant believed them to be, would not be criminal.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Riley, Sharpnack, Barnes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State of Iowa v. Hillary Lee TylerSupreme Court of Iowa· 2015-06-30· cited 153×
- McVey v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2007-03-30· cited 71×
- Danielle Kelly v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court· 2013-11-21· cited 53×
- Steven M. Sandleben v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2014-12-11· cited 31×
- Gauvin v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2007-12-31· cited 28×
- Linton v. DavisIndiana Court of Appeals· 2008-06-03· cited 26×
- S.W. v. Indiana Department of Child ServicesIndiana Court of Appeals· 2010-02-02· cited 25×
- Edward Lee Jackson v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2012-08-01· cited 22×
- Buchanan v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2009-01-23· cited 21×
- Southern v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2007-12-19· cited 17×
- State v. HicksIndiana Court of Appeals· 2008-03-12· cited 12×
- Southward v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2011-11-09· cited 11×
- Robert E. Hicks v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2014-03-11· cited 11×
- Dustin E. McCowan v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2014-04-23· cited 9×
- Robinson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2008-10-15· cited 8×
- Eversole v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2007-09-27· cited 4×
- Beldon v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2009-05-21· cited 1×
- Gonzalez v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2009-06-23· cited 1×
- In Re SWIndiana Court of Appeals· 2010-02-02
- Luke Keys Carson v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2012-03-20
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court· 1991-05-20· cited 6,060×
- Missouri v. SeibertSupreme Court· 2004-06-28· cited 1,541×
- Joyner v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1997-03-31· cited 217×
- Hicks v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1997-12-23· cited 191×
- Timberlake v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1997-12-30· cited 148×
- Wickizer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1993-12-27· cited 136×
- Potter v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1997-08-25· cited 98×
- Iqbal v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2004-03-22· cited 97×
- Davies v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2000-06-15· cited 44×
- Wright v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2002-04-29· cited 44×
- King v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2006-02-27· cited 16×
- Whitehair v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1995-07-31· cited 16×
- McCloud v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1998-07-21· cited 3×
- Bass v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2003-10-14· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.