Kolokouris v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• mutually exclusive verdict not returned when jury convicted accused only of reckless conduct and he “was not found guilty of any crime based on an intentional criminal act. [Cit.]”
• mutually exclusive verdict not returned when jury convicted accused only of reckless conduct and he \was not found guilty of any crime based on an intentional criminal act. [Cit.]\
• “A party cannot during the trial ignore what he thinks to be an injustice, take his chance on a favorable verdict, and complain later.”
• constitutional challenge cannot be raised for first time after a guilty verdict has been returned
• “Evidence as to motive is relevant, even though it may incidentally place the defendant’s character in issue.”
• “Generally speaking, the Confrontation Clause guarantees an opportunity for effective cross-examination, not cross-examination that is effective in whatever way and to whatever extent, the defense might wish.” (Citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).