Skip to main content
· 10/12/2005

Sosby v. Miller Brewing Co.

Citations

  • 415 F. Supp. 2d 809
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23301
  • 2005 WL 2574996

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering a similar argument but granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant where adding such claim would have been futile
  • expressing doubts on whether the plaintiff could add a similar claim at the summary judgment stage
  • “Evidence that an employer had been concerned about a problem before the employee engaged in protected activity undercuts the significance of temporal proximity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Watson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.