Skip to main content
· 1/12/2011

State Ex Rel. Lykos v. Fine

Citations

  • 330 S.W.3d 904
  • 2011 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1
  • 2011 WL 93011

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that as applied challenge raised in pretrial motion is not sufficient to preserve issue for review
  • holding that defendant’s as-applied challenge to the death penalty statute was premature where he had not been convicted or sentenced to death
  • recognizing that appeals in criminal cases are “permitted only when they are specifically authorized by statute”
  • holding that as applied challenge raised in pretrial motion is not sufficient to preserve issue for review
  • holding that defendant’s as-applied challenge to the death penalty statute was premature where he had neither been convicted or sentenced to death
  • holding that defendant’s as-applied challenge to the death penalty statute was premature where he had neither been convicted or sentenced to death

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cochran, Keller, Meyers, Johnson, Keasler, Hervey, Price, Womack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.