· 1/12/2011
State Ex Rel. Lykos v. Fine
Citations
- 330 S.W.3d 904
- 2011 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1
- 2011 WL 93011
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that as applied challenge raised in pretrial motion is not sufficient to preserve issue for review
- holding that defendant’s as-applied challenge to the death penalty statute was premature where he had not been convicted or sentenced to death
- recognizing that appeals in criminal cases are “permitted only when they are specifically authorized by statute”
- holding that as applied challenge raised in pretrial motion is not sufficient to preserve issue for review
- holding that defendant’s as-applied challenge to the death penalty statute was premature where he had neither been convicted or sentenced to death
- holding that defendant’s as-applied challenge to the death penalty statute was premature where he had neither been convicted or sentenced to death
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cochran, Keller, Meyers, Johnson, Keasler, Hervey, Price, Womack
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.