Skip to main content

Solomon v. Solomon

Citations

  • 861 So. 2d 1218
  • 2003 WL 22927241

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that in imputing income a court must consider a spouse’s recent work history, as well as his occupational qualifications and the prevailing salary in his field
  • reversing an alimony award \based on the trial court's failure to apply the correct legal standard to determine whether to impute income to the Former Wife\
  • “In imputing income, the court must consider recent work history as well as occupational qualifications and prevailing earnings.”
  • “Because the trial court failed to calculate child support under the guidelines, the award of child support must be reversed.”
  • first citing Cozier v. Cozier, 819 So.2d 834 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); and then citing Pinion v. Pinion, 818 So.2d 557 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002)
  • “The trial court made no findings that would demonstrate that there was a need to secure the former wife’s alimony, nor does the record demonstrate that such a need exists in this case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kelly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.