District Court of Appeal of Florida· 12/12/2003
Solomon v. Solomon
Citations
- 861 So. 2d 1218
- 2003 WL 22927241
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that in imputing income a court must consider a spouse’s recent work history, as well as his occupational qualifications and the prevailing salary in his field
- reversing an alimony award \based on the trial court's failure to apply the correct legal standard to determine whether to impute income to the Former Wife\
- “In imputing income, the court must consider recent work history as well as occupational qualifications and prevailing earnings.”
- “Because the trial court failed to calculate child support under the guidelines, the award of child support must be reversed.”
- first citing Cozier v. Cozier, 819 So.2d 834 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); and then citing Pinion v. Pinion, 818 So.2d 557 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002)
- “The trial court made no findings that would demonstrate that there was a need to secure the former wife’s alimony, nor does the record demonstrate that such a need exists in this case.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kelly
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Levy v. LevyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-04-29· cited 32×
- Freilich v. FreilichDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-03-04· cited 24×
- Mondello v. TorresDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-11-17· cited 23×
- Richardson v. RichardsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-04-01· cited 14×
- Augoshe v. LehmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-08-10· cited 14×
- Vanzant v. VanzantDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-08-15· cited 12×
- Massam v. MassamDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-01-23· cited 10×
- Cullen v. CullenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-08-20· cited 9×
- Riley v. RileyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-07-10· cited 7×
- Davidson v. DavidsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-08-11· cited 7×
- Castaldi v. CastaldiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-11-28· cited 6×
- Melo v. MeloDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-02-04· cited 5×
- Helling v. BartokDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-06-18· cited 4×
- Nicholas v. NicholasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-03-26· cited 4×
- Jones v. JonesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-12-21· cited 3×
- Vollmer v. VollmerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-03-05· cited 2×
- Busciglio v. BusciglioDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-07-03· cited 2×
- MacRAE-BILLEWICZ v. BILLEWICZDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-08-20· cited 1×
- Shimer v. CoreyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-11-22· cited 1×
- Lathrop v. LathropDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-04-22
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Segall v. SegallDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-03-25· cited 50×
- Finley v. ScottSupreme Court of Florida· 1998-01-29· cited 45×
- Shrove v. ShroveDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-01-20· cited 39×
- Cozier v. CozierDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-05-08· cited 24×
- Cushman v. CushmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-09-11· cited 23×
- Farley v. FarleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-12-05· cited 18×
- Spillert v. SpillertDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-07-03· cited 16×
- Kearley v. KearleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-09-08· cited 16×
- Moorehead v. MooreheadDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-12-08· cited 14×
- Pinion v. PinionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-01-25· cited 13×
- Koeppel v. HolyszkoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-09-30· cited 12×
- Stultz v. StultzDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-12-23· cited 8×
- Brooks v. BrooksDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-07-08· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.