Skip to main content

Vanzant v. Vanzant

Citations

  • 82 So. 3d 991
  • 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 12794
  • 2011 WL 3558151

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that trial court erred by using figures that represented gross income rather than net income
  • holding that in determining the amount of alimony on remand,, the trial court “shall make specific findings as to the former wife’s need for alimony and the former husband’s ability to pay”
  • holding that a finding of former husband’s net income was not supported by the record because the relied-upon figures reflected the gross income shown on former husband’s amended financial affidavit, not his net income
  • finding trial court erred in “split[ting] the difference” in valuations put forth by the parties
  • “It appears that the trial court simply ‘split the difference’ between the values presented by the parties. This was error.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thomas, Wetherell, Swanson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.