Nicholas v. Nicholas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that further evidentiary proceedings on remand are appropriate when necessary to serve the judicial purpose of promoting equity in marriage dissolutions
• instructing trial court to base alimony and child support on actual income upon failure of proof to support imputed income
• noting that remand for additional evidence “is appropriate in order to cure a deficiency that was not attributable to the trial judge, but to one or both of the parties” (citing Batson v. Batson, 821 So.2d 1141, 1143 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002) (Peterson, J., concurring))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Pavese v. Pavese
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-07-14· cited 11×
• Glenn Robert Broga, Former Husband v. Linda Marie Broga, Former Wife
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-10-11· cited 2×
• Thompson v. Malicki
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-07-10· cited 1×
• Zambuto v. Zambuto
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-12-16

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ritter v. Ritter
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-04-04· cited 42×
• Hinton v. Smith
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-11-13· cited 30×
• Solomon v. Solomon
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-12-12· cited 23×
• Batson v. Batson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-06-28· cited 9×