Pinion v. Pinion

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “In the absence of special circumstances, a spouse cannot be required to maintain life insurance for the purposes of securing alimony obligations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Plichta v. Plichta
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-04-29· cited 40×
• Cozier v. Cozier
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-05-08· cited 24×
• Solomon v. Solomon
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-12-12· cited 23×
• Layeni v. Layeni
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-02-28· cited 22×
• Ruberg v. Ruberg
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-11-07· cited 21×
• Alpert v. Alpert
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-10-15· cited 21×
• Alpha v. Alpha
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-11-05· cited 19×
• Eisele v. Eisele
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-05-25· cited 3×
• Shimer v. Corey
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-11-22· cited 1×
• Rubinstein v. Rubinstein
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-12-31· cited 1×
• Lathrop v. Lathrop
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-04-22

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Canakaris v. Canakaris
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1980-03-27· cited 2,288×
• Kearley v. Kearley
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-09-08· cited 16×
• Moorehead v. Moorehead
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-12-08· cited 14×