Skip to main content
Fifth Circuit· 9/12/1983

Soden v. Freightliner Corp.

Citations

  • 714 F.2d 498
  • 14 Fed. R. Serv. 306

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting the minimal probative value of allegations of defective design, as opposed to evidence showing the particular circumstances of similar accidents
  • court did not abuse its discretion when it excluded an expert's opinion that was based on unreliable accident statistics
  • preparation of statistical data strictly in anticipation of litigation is a factor to be considered in exelud- ing expert testimony
  • “Though the courts have afforded experts a wide latitude in picking and choosing the sources on which to base opinions, Rule 703 nonetheless requires courts to examine the reliability of those sources.”
  • “[A]lthough the use of unsupported allegations in prior lawsuits . . . may not have been of the strongest probative value, neither was the lack of support particularly prejudicial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gar, Garwood, Politz, Tuttle, Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

71 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.