Skip to main content
· 3/12/1979

United States v. Hancho C. Kim

Citations

  • 595 F.2d 755
  • 193 U.S. App. D.C. 370
  • 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 16327

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding bank record was inadmissible under Rule 803(6) because, inter alia, it was generated in response to a government subpoena
  • approving district court’s refusal to admit summary where underlying documents not available
  • analyzing admissibility of statement under Rule 803(6) before residual hearsay exception analysis
  • report of specific words uttered made fourteen months after the event held to be inadmissible
  • document inadmissible because defendant failed to provide \stronger evidence\ of truth of matter asserted
  • telex excluded because, inter alia, it did not meet the requirements of part (B) of Rule 803(24); United States v. Reese, 183 U.S.App.D.C. 1 n. 18 at 10-11, 561 F.2d 894 n. 18 at 903-04 (D.C. Cir. 1977

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McGowan, Leyenthal, MacKinnon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.