· 3/12/1979
United States v. Hancho C. Kim
Citations
- 595 F.2d 755
- 193 U.S. App. D.C. 370
- 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 16327
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding bank record was inadmissible under Rule 803(6) because, inter alia, it was generated in response to a government subpoena
- approving district court’s refusal to admit summary where underlying documents not available
- analyzing admissibility of statement under Rule 803(6) before residual hearsay exception analysis
- report of specific words uttered made fourteen months after the event held to be inadmissible
- document inadmissible because defendant failed to provide \stronger evidence\ of truth of matter asserted
- telex excluded because, inter alia, it did not meet the requirements of part (B) of Rule 803(24); United States v. Reese, 183 U.S.App.D.C. 1 n. 18 at 10-11, 561 F.2d 894 n. 18 at 903-04 (D.C. Cir. 1977
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McGowan, Leyenthal, MacKinnon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.