Skip to main content
· 4/4/1989

Allen Peteet, Ann I. Greenhill, Individually and on Behalf of the Heirs of the Estate of James Edward Greenhill, Deceased v. Dow Chemical Company

Citations

  • 868 F.2d 1428
  • 27 Fed. R. Serv. 1047
  • 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 4499
  • 1989 WL 23213

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the decision to transfer rests within the sound discretion of the district court
  • finding that a party’s failure to seek a venue change with reasonable promptness weighs against transfer
  • recognizing and applying Peteet in denying petition for mandamus where the district court determined that the movant had failed to file its motion to transfer with reasonable promptness
  • rejecting argument seeking to exclude opinion of expert toxicologist because he never personally examined the plaintiff
  • requiring defendant to make a showing that the forum sought is more convenient
  • finding no abuse of dis- cretion in denying defendant’s § 1404(a) motion filed eighteen months after the case was remanded, because “[p]arties seeking a change of venue should act with ‘reasonable prompt- ness.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gee, Sneed, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.