DeGroft v. Lancaster Silo Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “[t]he UCC does not apply to service contracts or to materials used or supplied in connection with the performance of such contracts.”
• contract calling for sale of materials and construction of grain silo \predominantly concerned the rendition of services\
• \Courts have generally looked principally to the language of the parties' agreement and the circumstances surrounding its making in determining the predominant thrust of the transaction.\
• contract calling for sale of materials and construction of grain silo “predominantly concerned the rendition of services”
• “Courts have generally-looked principally to the language of the parties’ agreement and the circumstances surrounding its making in determining the predominant thrust of the transaction.”
• trial court improperly ruled as a matter of law that the U.C.C. would apply where a factfinder could reasonably conclude that the contract was one for services

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).