Skip to main content

Sneed v. State

Citations

  • 803 S.W.2d 833
  • 1991 WL 25385

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • the State made numerous statements regarding the misstatement of law during final argument
  • the collective effect of the State's errors supported a finding of egregious harm
  • the State made numerous statements regarding the misstatement of law during final argument
  • the collective effect of the State’s errors supported a finding of egregious harm
  • charge’s application portion contained error where the charge allowed the jury to convict the defendant for assaulting an officer when the application paragraph focused on the nature of the defendant’s conduct rather than the defendant’s intended result
  • the State used a hypothetical to illustrate misstatement of law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thomas and Ovard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

49 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.