Skip to main content

Green v. State

Citations

  • 891 S.W.2d 289
  • 1994 WL 681972

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that overwhelming evidence and defense counsel’s arguments to the jury in closing argument were sufficient to render erroneous definitions of “intentionally” and “knowingly” not egregiously harmful
  • concluding that overwhelming evidence and defense counsel‘s arguments to the jury in closing argument were sufficient to render erroneous definitions of ―intentionally‖ and ―knowingly‖ not egregiously harmful
  • concluding that overwhelming evidence and defense counsel’s arguments to the jury in closing argument were sufficient to render erroneous definitions of “intentionally” and “knowingly” not egregiously harmful

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Oliver-Parrott, O'Connor, Duggan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.