Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 3/29/1996

Smolen v. Chater

Citations

  • 80 F.3d 1273
  • 96 Daily Journal DAR 3640
  • 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2159
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 5796
  • 1996 WL 140992

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that ALJ erred where the ALJ rejected the testimony of claimant’s family members about claimant’s symptoms because the medical records did not corroborate those symptoms
  • holding that ALJ erred where the ALJ rejected the testimony of claimant’s family members about claimant’s symptoms because the medical records did not corroborate those symptoms
  • concluding that it was legal error for the ALJ to disregard some of the opinions of the claimant’s physicians without providing reasons for doing so
  • concluding that it was legal error for the ALJ to disregard some of the opinions of the claimant’s physicians without providing reasons for doing so
  • recognizing that “many home activities may not be easily transferrable to a 13 work environment”
  • holding that “the step-two inquiry is a de minimis 13 screening device to dispose of groundless claims”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ferguson, Hug, Schwarzer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

459 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.