Mary M. MAGALLANES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that hypothetical questions the ALJ poses to the vocational expert must include all of the claimant's limitations and restrictions
• concluding that the ALJ properly relied on inconsistency with claimant’s testimony to reject medical opinion
• holding that “the treating physician’s opinion is not . . . necessarily conclusive as to either a physical condition or the ultimate issue of disability.”
• holding that it is proper for an ALJ to limit a hypothetical to restrictions supported by substantial evidence in the record
• holding that ALJ properly rejected treating physician's opinion when inconsistent with other evidence in record
• holding that a proper hypothetical need only include those restrictions that are supported by substantial evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).