Donna J. SWENSON, Widow of Herman J. Swenson, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• directing an award of benefits where no useful purpose would be served by further proceedings
• finding that the claimant’s tes- timony “was supported by substantial medical evidence,” and that the only expert testified that the claimant would not be able to engage in any work
• directing an award of benefits where no useful purpose would be served by further proceedings
• concluding the ALJ had rejected a claimant’s symptom testimony where the ALJ found the claimant credible but determined that he “felt himself more limited than medical evidence established that he was” (cleaned up)
• requiring ALJs to reject VE testimony that is inconsistent with the Medical-Vocational Guidelines
• requiring ALJs to reject VE testimony that is inconsistent with the Medical-Vocational Guidelines

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).