Betty J. DODRILL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it is “not sufficient for the ALJ to make only general findings; he must state which pain testimony is not credible and what evidence suggests the complaints are not credible”
• stating that an ALJ 4 must indicate which testimony is not credible and what evidence supports that finding
• holding the ALJ, who incorrectly 19 thought the lay witnesses repeated the claimant’s complaints, wrongfully dismissed lay witness 20 testimony for not giving germane reasons specific to each
• noting that to satisfy the “clear and convincing” standard, the 17 ALJ must “state which pain testimony is not credible and what evidence suggests the complaints 18 are not credible”
• noting that to satisfy the “clear and convincing” standard, the ALJ must “state 22 which pain testimony is not credible and what evidence suggests the complaints are not 23 credible.”
• explaining the Regulations instruct the ALJ to “consider observations by non- 1 medical sources as to how an impairment affects a claimant’s ability to work”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).