District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 12/3/2009
Smith v. United States
Citations
- 984 A.2d 196
- 2009 D.C. App. LEXIS 606
- 2009 WL 4327930
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[O]ne cannot have an expectation of finality [protected by the Double Jeopardy Clause] where the court never had jurisdiction to render the sentence.”
- Non-jurisdictional but inflexible “[c]laim-processing rules . . . assure relief to a party properly raising them, but do not compel the same result if the party forfeits them.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Washington, Blackburne-Rigsby, Newman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Mathis v. District of Columbia Housing AuthorityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2015-10-08· cited 32×
- Emanuel Jenkins and Azariah Israel v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2013-12-12· cited 31×
- KRISHNA PATRICK MUIR v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIADistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2016-01-14· cited 20×
- Gatewood v. District of Columbia Water & Sewer AuthorityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2013-07-03· cited 19×
- Neill v. District of Columbia Public Employee Relations BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2014-06-19· cited 14×
- In re Na.H.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2013-05-02· cited 12×
- Ben Saidi v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2015-02-26· cited 11×
- Capitol Hill Restoration Society v. District of Columbia Mayor's Agent for Historic PreservationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2012-05-24· cited 10×
- MICHAEL POTH v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2016-12-29· cited 5×
- Ross Green v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2017-07-20· cited 5×
- Jacob Herring v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2017-09-14· cited 4×
- Unnamed caseDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2014-06-19
- Kirby Vining v. Executive Bd. of the DC Health Benefit Exchange Auth.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2017-12-07
- Sessoms-Deloatch v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2020-06-18
- Jordan v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2020-08-27
- Dixon v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2023-11-22
- District of Columbia v. BryantDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2024-01-04
- Wilson v. BowserDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2025-02-06
- ANC 2C v. D.C. Alcoholic Beverage and Cannabis BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2025-09-18
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court· 2006-02-22· cited 6,493×
- Bowles v. RussellSupreme Court· 2007-06-14· cited 3,839×
- Murphy v. HuntSupreme Court· 1982-04-26· cited 1,805×
- M. A. P. v. RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1971-12-29· cited 973×
- Eberhart v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2005-10-31· cited 799×
- Schacht v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1970-05-25· cited 265×
- United States v. EdwardsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1981-05-08· cited 205×
- Frendak v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1979-10-24· cited 162×
- Lee v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1995-12-14· cited 54×
- Lynch v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1989-04-05· cited 42×
- Brown v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2002-04-04· cited 26×
- Diamen v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1999-02-25· cited 22×
- Lindsay v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1987-02-11· cited 22×
- Dean v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2007-12-28· cited 13×
- Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-12-30· cited 11×
- United States v. RobinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1978-06-12· cited 10×
- Littlejohn v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2000-04-20· cited 5×
- Boykins v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2004-08-19· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.