District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 9/14/2017
Jacob Herring v. United States
Citations
- 169 A.3d 354
- 2017 D.C. App. LEXIS 272
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing the sentencing court's ability to reallocate the punishment after some but not all convictions have been vacated
- providing examples of “circumstances” that “undermine a defendant’s sentencing expectations even when he has started serving time”
- “[T]he ‘total term’ provision—which remained unchanged since the first judgment and commitment order was issued—supplied 8 concrete information about the court’s sentencing intent.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Glickman, Fisher, Reid
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.