H & v Engineering, Inc. v. Idaho State Board of Professional Engineers & Land Surveyors

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that statute prohibiting unprofessional conduct did not provide sufficient warning to group of engineers that their acts would subject them to discipline
• once a post-trial motion is decided and an appeal is taken, the lower court has no jurisdiction to reverse its prior order
• “Once a notice of appeal has been perfected the district court is divested of jurisdiction and the proceed ings are stayed during the pendency of the appeal.”
• “without clearly articulated standards as a backdrop against which the court can review discipline, the judicial function is reduced to serving as a rubberstamp for the Board’s action”
• “Parties cannot confer jurisdiction upon the court by stipulation, agreement, or estoppel.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).