Nagel v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The revocation of a defendant’s probation based on a violation not alleged in the charging document is a deprivation of the right to due process of law.” (quoting Richardson v. State, 694 So. 2d 147, 147 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Perkins v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-04-16· cited 22×
• Jackson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-08-30· cited 19×
• Howard v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-09-29· cited 9×
• Davis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-02-02· cited 4×
• Grant v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-03-05· cited 2×
• S.M. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-05-21· cited 2×
• BARRUETA v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-06-15
• J.T.J., A CHILD v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2022-11-02

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Wood v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1989-05-25· cited 96×
• Blakley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-12-08· cited 56×
• Richardson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-06-04· cited 24×
• Crum v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1973-12-14· cited 18×
• Smith v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-07-15· cited 16×
• Harris v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-09-26· cited 8×
• Wyns v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-09-20· cited 5×
• Palmer v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-07-08· cited 5×
• Connor v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-05-17· cited 1×