Skip to main content

Garcia v. State

Citations

  • 792 S.W.2d 88
  • 1990 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 124
  • 1990 WL 82811

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that statement must provide more than general allusion of abuse to satisfy requirements of the outcry witness statute
  • holding that where the record was void of specific details of statements made to an individual, the individual was not properly designated an outcry witness
  • recognizing that statement must provide more than general allusion of abuse to satisfy requirements of the outcry witness statute
  • holding that statement about offense “must be more than words which give a general allusion that something in the area of child abuse was going on.”
  • holding that the outcry witness must be the first adult “to whom the child makes a statement that in some discernible manner describes the alleged offense”
  • holding that a Child Protective Services worker was the proper outcry witness when the complainant told her teacher only that something had happened at home relating to child abuse

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miller, Clinton, Teague, Sturns

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

463 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.