Smith v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that video statute “provides a detailed procedure by which a videotaped interview of a child may be admitted into evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bays, Michael Jay
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2013-04-17· cited 88×
• Austin v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2007-04-10· cited 74×
• Bousquet v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2001-05-03· cited 21×
• Smith v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2001-11-28· cited 18×
• Tirey Glen Smith v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 2002-04-03
• Kimberly Sue Austin v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2007-04-10
• Ryan Jefferson Mead v. the State of Texas
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2021-12-16

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Maryland v. Craig
  Supreme Court· 1990-06-27· cited 2,040×
• White v. Illinois
  Supreme Court· 1992-01-15· cited 1,508×
• Briggs v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1990-05-16· cited 598×
• Long v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1987-07-01· cited 195×
• Mallory v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1988-06-15· cited 102×
• Davis v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-12-04· cited 53×
• Lively v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1998-05-20· cited 39×
• Ward v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 1995-11-01· cited 9×