Skip to main content

Lively v. State

Citations

  • 968 S.W.2d 363
  • 1998 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 65

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that trial court heard testimony that child “regressed” when in the defendant’s presence and that requiring the child victim to testify would pose a “risk” to the child’s recovery
  • noting that trial court heard testimony that child A regressed @ when in the defendant = s presence and that requiring the child victim to testify would pose a A risk @ to the child = s recovery
  • noting, “Nothing in [Craig] requires that a trial court make explicit, as opposed to implicit, findings regarding the necessity of a special procedure to protect a … witness.”
  • good cause shown when Wal Mart did not receive requests directed to employee and immediately moved to withdraw the deemed admissions upon learning that employee had failed to respond
  • witness testifying by videotape was child victim the defendant allegedly sexually assaulted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mansfield, McCormick, Keller, Price, Holland, Womack, Meyers, Baird, Overstreet

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.