Skip to main content

Mallory v. State

Citations

  • 752 S.W.2d 566
  • 1988 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 121
  • 1988 WL 59725

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that admitting the complainant’s videotaped testimony in violation of the Confrontation Clause was harmful error where the defendant’s sworn, written statement denied the charge against him
  • concluding that admitting the complainant's videotaped testimony in violation of the Confrontation Clause was harmful error where the defendant's sworn, written statement denied the charge against him
  • \[T]he elective propriety of expressing the test for harmless error in a less than uniform fashion is no longer available.\
  • “Although the right of confrontation is vital to an ordered criminal justice system and of constitutional magnitude, it is none the less a trial right.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Duncan, Davis, White, Teague, McCormick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

75 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.