Skip to main content

Smith v. State

Citations

  • 959 S.W.2d 1
  • 1997 WL 195290

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting basis for judicial estoppel is the assertion of a position clearly inconsistent with a previous position accepted by the court
  • \a `benefit' could . . . be anything to which a price can be assigned\
  • \a 'benefit' could . . . be anything to which a price can be assigned\
  • Judge read former Rule of Criminal Evidence 610, barring leading questions
  • Judge read former Rule of Criminal Evidence 610, barring leading questions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis, Cummings, McDonald

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

64 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

74 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.