Skip to main content

Smith v. State

Citations

  • 778 So. 2d 329
  • 2000 WL 1879817

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the police unlawfully arrested the defendant for trespassing because he did not commit the crime in the officers’ presence
  • holding that a convenience store was not posted because the sign was attached to -the building rather than the lot’s boundaries
  • holding that convenience store was not \posted land\ as defined by statute because \no trespassing\ sign was attached to building rather than being posted along the lot's boundaries
  • reversing where no evidence that anyone, owner or police, had previously warned appellant not to trespass and no evidence “no trespassing” signs complied with statute
  • “A law enforcement officer may not make a warrantless arrest for a misdemeanor, such as this trespass, unless every element of the crime is committed in his presence.”
  • where although the public had an invitation to shop a privately owned convenience store because it was quasi public property, the owner could still limit or revoke the invitation to come on his land

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Northcutt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.