Skip to main content

Corn v. State

Citations

  • 332 So. 2d 4

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the Court has a duty “to adopt a reasonable interpretation of a statute which removes it farthest from constitutional infirmity”
  • interpreting predecessor statute and noting that it could cover the situation where someone is causing a disturbance in a mall lobby and is asked to leave
  • “The right of property has been characterized as a sacred right, the protection of which is an important object of government.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Roberts

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.