FEH, JR. v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that cannabis should have been excluded where defendant disclosed his possession of it during improper investigative detention
• holding that officer who observed two males standing in parking lot of closed business during late hours in a high narcotics area lacked reasonable suspicion to justify investigative detention
• holding a seizure, rather than a consensual encounter, occurred when several police officers jumped from their cars, and as the juvenile defendant started to walk away, he stopped and returned when one officer called to him: “yo, come here”
• “Whether a seizure [in the absence of a formal arrest] has occurred ‘is determined by what a reasonable person in [the defendant’s] position would have concluded based upon the conduct of the officers.’” (quoting G.M. v. State, 19 So.3d 973, 980 n. 5 (Fla.2009))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).