Powell v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding Smith distinguishable because here, the defendant knew he was not permitted to be on the property by actual notice provided by the store owner and by a \No Trespass\ sign
• finding Smith distinguishable because here, the defendant knew he was not permitted to be on the property by actual notice provided by the store owner and by a “No Trespass” sign

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Klinow v. Island Court at Boca West Property Owners' Ass'n
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-06-29· cited 9×
• K.M.B. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-08-10· cited 2×
• KMB v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-08-10

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Connor v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2001-09-06· cited 331×
• Porter v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-08-23· cited 31×
• Smith v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-12-29· cited 20×