Supreme Court of Iowa· 9/29/1982
Smith v. State
Citations
- 324 N.W.2d 299
- 1982 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 1467
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that courts have uniformly-rejected a cause of action.for negligent criminal investigations by police officers
- holding “law enforcement officers have no liability for mere negligence in the investigation of crime”
- holding “law enforcement officers have no liability'for mere negligence in investigation of crime.”
- declining to recognize “an independent tort for negligent investigation of crime by law enforcement officers.”
- overruling trial court’s denial of motion to dismiss and holding, as a matter of law, that there is no tort of negligent investigation of a crime by law enforcement officers
- declining to recognize a tort for negligent investigation of a crime
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Legrand, Carter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Sankey v. RichenbergerSupreme Court of Iowa· 1990-05-23· cited 67×
- Dever v. FowlerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1992-02-18· cited 50×
- Keates v. City of VancouverCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1994-03-08· cited 46×
- Hildenbrand v. CoxSupreme Court of Iowa· 1985-06-19· cited 46×
- MH by and Through Callahan v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa· 1986-04-16· cited 39×
- Manuela Rodriguez v. United StatesFirst Circuit· 1995-07-17· cited 31×
- Maxine Gail Veatch v. City of Waverly and Jason Leonard, Individually and in His Official CapacitySupreme Court of Iowa· 2015-01-09· cited 31×
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas· 1996-12-06· cited 29×
- Morris v. LeafSupreme Court of Iowa· 1995-07-19· cited 28×
- Waskey v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court· 1996-01-12· cited 25×
- Fitzpatrick v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa· 1989-04-19· cited 21×
- Weltzin v. COBANK, ACBSupreme Court of Iowa· 2001-09-06· cited 20×
- Wimer v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals· 1993-02-18· cited 18×
- Wongittilin v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 2001-12-07· cited 18×
- Hutcherson v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1996-10-08· cited 16×
- Kenneth Lahm v. Michael Farrington & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2014-03-14· cited 16×
- Rittscher v. State, Iowa Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of Iowa· 1984-06-13· cited 15×
- Landeros v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-02-20· cited 14×
- Hulstedt v. City of ScottsdaleD. Arizona· 2012-08-06· cited 13×
- Schmidt v. MahoneySupreme Court of Iowa· 2003-04-02· cited 12×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. NeustadtSupreme Court· 1961-05-29· cited 572×
- Barry J. Quinones v. United States of America, and United States Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs and Its Agents and EmployeesThird Circuit· 1974-03-06· cited 106×
- Brody v. RubySupreme Court of Iowa· 1978-06-28· cited 98×
- Wilson v. NepstadSupreme Court of Iowa· 1979-07-25· cited 94×
- Lyddon v. ShawAppellate Court of Illinois· 1978-01-23· cited 76×
- Hubbard v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa· 1969-01-14· cited 58×
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. PhersonSupreme Court of Colorado· 1954-06-14· cited 47×
- Cole v. TaylorSupreme Court of Iowa· 1981-02-18· cited 45×
- Weber v. MadisonSupreme Court of Iowa· 1977-03-16· cited 41×
- Wilson v. O'NEALDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1960-02-09· cited 38×
- Johnson v. City of PacificaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1970-02-04· cited 28×
- Gerald J. Hoesl v. United States of America, Dr. David Allen KasuboskiNinth Circuit· 1980-10-02· cited 23×
- Hoesl v. United StatesN.D. California· 1978-04-26· cited 19×
- Zerbe v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1978-05-12· cited 18×
- Nicholas v. Michigan State Employees Retirement BoardMichigan Court of Appeals· 1985-07-01· cited 18×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.