Skip to main content
· 6/19/1985

Hildenbrand v. Cox

Citations

  • 369 N.W.2d 411
  • 1985 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 1056

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Noting its frequent reliance on the Restatement [Second], the court points to § 314A as instructive on law enforcement officers’ “special duty to aid and protect” arrestees.
  • disregarding summary judgment affidavit because it was not supported by personal knowledge and would not be admissible in evidence
  • affirming summary judgment dismissing tort claim by estate of drunk driver who died in accident shortly after police questioned but failed to arrest him following his collision with a planter on the town square
  • affirming summary judgment dismissing tort claim by estate of drunk driver who died in accident shortly after police questioned but failed to arrest him following his collision with a planter on the town square
  • affirming summary judgment dismissing tort claim by estate of drunk driver who died in accident shortly after police questioned but failed to arrest him following his collision with a planter on the town square
  • decision by police whether to take an intoxicated person into custody is permissive rather than mandatory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McCormick, McGiverin, Schultz, Carter, Wolle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.