Skip to main content

Fitzpatrick v. State

Citations

  • 439 N.W.2d 663
  • 1989 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 69
  • 1989 WL 37542

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that although State had duty to keep felons in custody which obligation flowed to the public at large, State had no legal duty to police officer injured by parolee given lack of special relationship between State and victim
  • affirming order dismissing plaintiffs suit for damages based on injury caused by parolee from Iowa penitentiary
  • affirming order dismissing plaintiff’s suit for damages based on injury caused by parolee from Iowa penitentiary
  • parole officer had no legal duty to police officer injured by parolee given lack of special relationship between actor and victim
  • parole officer had no legal duty to police officer injured by parolee
  • duty to control actionable only when there is a special relationship

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.