Skip to main content
· 2/18/1993

Wimer v. State

Citations

  • 841 P.2d 453
  • 122 Idaho 923

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Idaho does not recognize a INITIAL REVIEW ORDER BY SCREENING JUDGE - 6 cause of action for negligent investigation
  • holding that Idaho does not recognize a INITIAL REVIEW ORDER BY SCREENING JUDGE - 6 cause of action for negligent investigation
  • holding that Idaho does not recognize a cause of action for negligent investigation
  • recognizing police duty to use reasonable care in responding to life threatening calls
  • “[w]e agree with the policy that to hold investigators liable for their negligent acts would impair vigorous prosecution and have a chilling effect on law enforcement”
  • “[w]e agree with the policy that to hold investigators liable for their negligent acts would impair vigorous prosecution and have a chilling effect on law enforcement”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Swanstrom, Walters, Silak

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.