· 2/18/1993
Wimer v. State
Citations
- 841 P.2d 453
- 122 Idaho 923
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that Idaho does not recognize a INITIAL REVIEW ORDER BY SCREENING JUDGE - 6 cause of action for negligent investigation
- holding that Idaho does not recognize a INITIAL REVIEW ORDER BY SCREENING JUDGE - 6 cause of action for negligent investigation
- holding that Idaho does not recognize a cause of action for negligent investigation
- recognizing police duty to use reasonable care in responding to life threatening calls
- “[w]e agree with the policy that to hold investigators liable for their negligent acts would impair vigorous prosecution and have a chilling effect on law enforcement”
- “[w]e agree with the policy that to hold investigators liable for their negligent acts would impair vigorous prosecution and have a chilling effect on law enforcement”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Swanstrom, Walters, Silak
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.