Nelloms v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because the State stipulated to allow argument regarding testimony that would have been supplied by the missing witnesses, prejudice to the defendant from the delay was alleviated
• no speedy trial violation for delay of 51 months where defendant failed to prove impairment to his defense
• defendant’s constitutional right to speedy trial was not violated where defendant waited 51 months before asserting his right to a speedy trial and he suffered no impairment to his defense
• 51-month delay in non-capital murder trial constitutes “an extraordinary delay” which is presumptively prejudicial
• 51-month delay in non-capital murder trial constitutes \an extraordinary delay\ which is presumptively prejudicial
• 51-month delay in asserting right to a speedy trial weighs against defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).