Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Supreme Court of Connecticut· 6/15/1999

Smith v. Smith

Citations

  • 249 Conn. 265
  • 752 A.2d 1023
  • 1999 Conn. LEXIS 178

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that husband’s travel expenses in seeing children ‘‘falls squarely within the general criterion of the ‘needs of each of the parties’ ’’ under § 46b-82
  • noting that husband's travel expenses in seeing children \falls squarely within the general criterion of the 'needs of each of the parties' \ under § 46b-82
  • noting that “when an appellate court reverses a trial court judgment based on an improper alimony, property distribution, or child support award, the appellate court’s remand typically authorizes the trial court to reconsider all of the financial orders”
  • affirming limited remand regarding future interest in trust, where value of trust was unknown and not taken into account in other financial orders
  • noting “when an appellate court reverses a trial court judgment based on an improper alimony, property distribution, or child support award, the appellate court’s remand typically authorizes the trial court to reconsider all of the financial orders”
  • noting “when an appellate court reverses a trial court judgment based on an improper alimony, property distribution, or child support award, the appellate court’s remand typically authorizes the trial court to reconsider all of the financial orders”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Katz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

62 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.