Supreme Court of Connecticut· 7/11/2000
In re Michaela Lee R.
Citations
- 253 Conn. 570
- 756 A.2d 214
- 2000 Conn. LEXIS 205
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \we consider the statutory scheme as a whole and presume that the legislature intended to create a harmonious body of law\
- probate court cannot amend a birth certificate; it has jurisdiction \only when the facts exist on which the legislature has conditioned the exercise of their power.\
- appeal from probate is absolute right of aggrieved person
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Katz, McDonald
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. McKenzie-AdamsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-02-27· cited 90×
- Bender v. BenderSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-07-28· cited 52×
- In re Joshua S.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-05-14· cited 45×
- State v. RussoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-02-19· cited 39×
- Gipson v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-08-21· cited 33×
- Raftopol v. RameySupreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-01-05· cited 29×
- Commissioner of Transportation v. KahnSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-01-07· cited 19×
- In re Jessica M.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2002-08-06· cited 17×
- Mangiante v. NiemiecConnecticut Appellate Court· 2006-12-05· cited 14×
- Heussner v. HayesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-12-30· cited 12×
- Fischer v. ZollinoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2012-02-07· cited 11×
- Interlude, Inc. v. SkuratSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-10-07· cited 9×
- Okeke v. Commissioner of Public HealthSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2012-04-10· cited 7×
- Krevis v. City of BridgeportConnecticut Appellate Court· 2001-05-08· cited 6×
- Education Ass'n v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-01-08· cited 5×
- Porto v. SullivanConnecticut Appellate Court· 2010-02-16· cited 3×
- Commissioner of Labor v. WallConnecticut Appellate Court· 2002-04-30· cited 3×
- State v. BuieSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2014-07-22
- Shockley v. OkekeConnecticut Superior Court· 2004-07-14
- In re Probate Appeal of BarberaConnecticut Appellate Court· 2025-12-16
Cites
47 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court· 1976-05-19· cited 4,836×
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court· 1965-06-07· cited 4,329×
- Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1928-06-04· cited 2,291×
- Moore v. City of East ClevelandSupreme Court· 1977-05-31· cited 1,904×
- Whalen v. RoeSupreme Court· 1977-02-22· cited 1,722×
- Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. DanforthSupreme Court· 1976-07-01· cited 1,050×
- Bowers v. HardwickSupreme Court· 1986-09-11· cited 953×
- Castro v. VieraSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-05-10· cited 397×
- Dodd v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-08-12· cited 323×
- Quimby v. Kimberly Clark Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court· 1992-08-18· cited 265×
- Perkins v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-12-21· cited 160×
- Kimberly-Clark Corp. v. DubnoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-06-16· cited 159×
- Amodio v. AmodioSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-02-16· cited 137×
- Rhodes v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-08-12· cited 104×
- Chotkowski v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-03-18· cited 103×
- Carten v. CartenSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1966-05-05· cited 100×
- Dupuis v. Submarine Base Credit Union, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1976-03-16· cited 96×
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-06-15· cited 94×
- Doucette v. PomesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-01-26· cited 83×
- Kerin v. StangleSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-11-29· cited 76×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.